A Snelson DataBase and Index
Includes the Snelson Coat of Arms & Armory
Person Page 266
 |  |  |  |
Joscelin De Donjon1
F, #6631, Deceased
Interactive Pedigree Button
Family: Renaud Unknown
| Daughter | Elizabeth Unknown+ (b. about 1127, d. 14 September 1205) |
Main Events
| Also Known As | Joscelin De Donjon was also known as Joscelin De Donjon. |
| Also Known As | She was also known as Joscelin Unknown. |
| Marriage | Joscelin De Donjon and Renaud Unknown were married.1 |
| Death | She died Y Y, Y.1 |
| User Reference Number | She; 18930 |
| Her husband Renaud Unknown died. | |
| Her daughter Elizabeth Unknown was born about 1127. |
Citations
- [S1016] According to Otto Hirzell
Charles Henry King
M, #6632, Deceased, b. 1868, d. 1909
| Consanguinity | Partner of Ann Jane Preston (1st cousin 2 times removed of Adrian John Snelson) |
Family: Ann Jane Preston (b. 1867, d. about July 1942)
| Daughter | Mona Beatrice King+ (b. 1896, d. 1985) |
| Son | Edward H King+ (b. 1898, d. 1974) |
| Son | Harold Henry King (b. 17 July 1900, d. October 1951) |
| Daughter | Daisy King (b. 1902, d. 1976) |
| Daughter | Winifred Ida King (b. 20 April 1905, d. 19 June 1982) |
| Son | Ernest A King (b. 1907, d. 1974) |
Main Events
| Occupation | Charles Henry King was a Watch Wheel Cutter. |
| User Reference Number | He; 24072 |
| Birth | He was born in 1868. |
| Marriage | Charles Henry King and Ann Jane Preston were married in August 1894 in Devon Address: Torquay Ellacombe. |
| His daughter Mona Beatrice King was born in 1896. | |
| His son Edward H King was born in 1898. | |
| His son Harold Henry King was born on 17 July 1900. | |
| His daughter Daisy King was born in 1902. | |
| His daughter Winifred Ida King was born on 20 April 1905 in Torquay, Devon, England. | |
| His son Ernest A King was born in 1907. | |
| Death | Charles Henry King died in 1909, at age ~41. |
| His wife Ann Jane Preston died about July 1942 in Prescot. |
Ingelger Unknown1,2
M, #6640, Deceased, b. about 849
Interactive Pedigree Button
Family: Adelais Unknown
| Son | Fulk I The Red Unknown+ (d. after 13 August 941) |
Main Events
| Marriage | Ingelger Unknown and Adelais Unknown were married.2,1 |
| Death | He died Y Y, Y.1 |
| Residence | He resided Ingelger (Ingelgerius) was a viscount who held territory around Orléans and Angers at the end of the 9th century. He is the son of Tertullus. His son Fulk became the first count of Anjou. After Robert the Strong, he directed the resistance to the Norman invasions on the Loire. Through his descendant Geoffrey Plantagenet, father of Henry II of England, he is an ancestor to the present-day British royal family, including Elizabeth II, Queen of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and her son, Prince Charles, Prince of Wales.1 |
| User Reference Number | He; 18805 |
| His wife Adelais Unknown died. | |
| Birth | He was born about 849.1 |
Citations
Maud Hulme
F, #6642, Deceased, b. about 1500
Interactive Pedigree Button
Parents
| Father | Hugh Hulme |
| Mother | Elizabeth Massey (b. about 1480) |
Family: John Bostocke (b. about 1490)
| Daughter | Dorothy Bostocke |
| Son | Rafe Bostocke |
| Daughter | Margaret Bostocke |
| Daughter | Ellenor Bostocke |
| Daughter | Jane Bostocke |
| Daughter | Elizabeth Bostocke |
| Son | Robert Bostock+ (b. about 1530) |
Main Events
| Also Known As | Maud Hulme was also known as Maud Bostocke. |
| User Reference Number | She; 5084 |
| Birth | She was born about 1500 in Churton, Cheshire, England.1 |
| Marriage | Maud Hulme and John Bostocke were married in 1520 in Churton, Cheshire, England.2,1 |
| Her son Robert Bostock was born about 1530 in Churton, Cheshire, England. |
Citations
Mary Anderson
F, #6643, Deceased
Interactive Pedigree Button
Family: Thomas Snelson (b. about 1729)
| Son | John Thomas Snelson+ (b. 4 July 1759, d. 10 September 1843) |
Main Events
| Also Known As | Mary Anderson was also known as Unknown Snelson. |
| Marriage | Mary Anderson and Thomas Snelson were married. |
| User Reference Number | She; 10870 |
| Her son John Thomas Snelson was born on 4 July 1759. |
Thomas Snelson1
M, #6646, Deceased, b. October 1787, d. after 1840
Interactive Pedigree Button
Parents
| Father | Unknown Snelson |
| Person References | Fame & Infamy |
| Last Edited | 24 May 2025 |
Main Events
| User Reference Number | Thomas Snelson; 2236 |
| Biography | See notes. |
| Note | Event Memos from GEDCOM Import... Biography Thomas Snelson was a convicted criminal. He was found guilty at Stafford Assizes on 12 March 1812, and sentenced to life imprisonment or to be transported to the Colony of New South Wales for life. Thomas is listed as arriving in Sydney on the "Earl Spencer" a ship of 672 tons, 56 crew and 16 guns on Oct 9, 1813. The Earl Spencer carried 200 male prisoners leaving England on 2 June 1813, 4 dying on the voyage and the rest disembarking in the new Colony of New South Wales. The ship was under the command of Master William Mitchell and Surgeon D. Mackenzie. It sailed under the escort of HMS Kangaroo and brought the first steam engine to Australia. The journey via Madeira took 129 days. The "Earl Spencer" was built on the Thames in 1803, registered in London. The ship achieved some notoriety when it was preparing to leave Australia for its journey to Ceylon and China with a cargo of 58 casks of blue whale oil and troops ( this is what the manifests say - can this be right ? ) in 1814. A search produced 28 escapees. I've always wondered whether this means the escaping person, i.e. the escaper, or the person from whom the escaping person is escaping; which person would in your opinion be " the ESCAPED person " ? Funny old language English, isn't it? I think the problem is that the verb ' to escape ' can be both a transitive verb and an intransitive verb; the former meaning to elude and the latter meaning to become free and run like buggery; so, if the escapee was running like a cut snake with a firecracker up his arse, then he is indeed an escaping convict; but if on the other hand the escapee is eluding, evading and attempting to avoid capture, then the escapee must be the person from whom the escaping person is escaping ..... that is, the warder ! But I digress. To continue ...... some escaping sods concealed themselves in barrels of flour and cheese and one fellow wrapped himself up in a spare jib in the sail locker ! What has got me baffled about this story ( from Robert Hughes' " The Fatal Shore " ), is the implication that the Colony was exporting flour and cheese in 1814 - this is silly; Hughes must mean that these items were the stores and provisions for the ship's return voyage ? Thomas appears in the 1837 census of convicts as being aged 43 ( therefore being born about 1794 ), arriving in the Colony of New South Wales in 1833 - ( this is a mistake as other records have his arriving on the Earl Spencer in 1813 aged 25 years ( making his year of birth about 1788 ). In 1837, he was on a Ticket of Leave at Bathurst. This means that he must have been born about 43 years before 1837, that is about 1894; this doesn't tie in with his being aged 25 when transported - his date of birth being either circa 1794 or 1788 - depending on which record we look at. The records of the Staffordshire Assizes say that Thomas was on trial on 12 March 1812 and that he was committed for that trial on October 21st 1811 when he was aged 24 years - making his birthdate between 22 October 1786 and 21 October 1787. I am still confused about dates of birth calculated from ages given by Thomas in the Australian convict records. From the Assizes it looks like Thomas the convict was born between 22 October 1786 and 21 October 1787 because he was aged 24 on 21 October 1811. When he arrived in Sydney on the Earl Spencer on 9 October 1813 he was aged 25 years and therefore born between 10 October 1787 and 9 October 1788. Doesn't that mean that he was born between the 10th and 21st October in 1787 ? I am sure that this is mathematically correct. I am not so confident about the quality of the records. There is a chance that he may be the Thomas William Snelson, son of Rev Jeoffry Snelson, Vicar of the Parish of Reigate. Charles J. Snelson is currently sleuthing this connection whilst I am trying to find out whether he married in Australia and what happened to him after 1837. We now know that he was convicted on several counts of petty larceny and burglary. He was originally committed for trial on 5 April 1809 charged with burglariously breaking into the dwelling house of William Whitworth of Willenhall and stealing a child's frock, a pincushion and divers other goods the property of Joseph Bird; ( on this charge he was acquitted ); also with burglariously breaking into the dwelling house of John Brevett at Willenhall, and stealing two hammers and divers other goods the property of the said John Brevett and George Yates, also with burglariously breaking into the dwelling house of Moses Mattox at Wednesfield and stealing a shirt and handkerchief and muslin curtain the property of the said Moses Mattox and also with burglariously breaking into the dwelling of Benjamin Cox of Wolverhampton and stealing two birdcages 24 keys and divers other goods the property of the said Benjamin Cox ( on this last he was condemned ). He was condemned on the last charge to death. He must have been transported somewhere because he was again on trial on the 12th of March 1812 No. 9 case to be tried states as follows " Thomas Snelson age 24 committed October 21st ( 1811 ) by the Rev A. E. Hoden for feloniously returning from transportation before expiration thereof without lawful excuse. Condemned. " We do know that when he arrived in Australia in 1813 that he was 5' 5" tall, of sallow/fair complexion and that he had hazel eyes. With this information to hand, I was puzzled that I could not find Thomas in the marriages or deaths in New South Wales. If he had been transported for life, then he may have been pardoned after 1830, but why did it take him from 1813 to 1830 to earn the right to his ticket of leave. Perhaps something else happened to him ? With these thoughts, I went to the State Archives Office. Herein lies the further riveting tales of " Thomas the Lock " ! I found the following :- No sign of Thomas in Convict Deaths. No sign of Thomas in Convict Marriages 4/4549 1828-1879 …. but I did hit the Jackpot with : - ( 1 ) Snelson Thomas 1814 April 4,5 On lists of convicts to be sent to the Derwent per " Windham " ( Reel 6004; 4/3493 pp. 127, 135 ). ( 2 ) Snelson Thomas 1815 Oct 22 On list of prisoners to be sent to Newcastle per " Estramina " ( Reel 6004; 4/3494 p.235 ). ( 3 ) Snelson Thomas 1823 Oct 31 On lists of prisoners transported to Port Macquarie per " Lady Nelson " ( Reel 6019; 4/3864 pp 84, 446-7 ). Note that entries ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) use the words " to be sent " whereas entry ( 3 ) says " transported ". At this stage I believe that he may not have gone to Tasmania or to Newcastle at all. I think he was transported directly from Sydney to Port Macquarie. Incidentally, the Lady Nelson was under the command in January 1802 of Lieutenant John Murray, who surveyed the southern coast and discovered a great bay on the mainland near the head of the Bass Strait, which in due course became Port Phillip Bay : the harbour of the modern Melbourne - but sorry, I digress again. Hobart, the capital of Tasmania, lies on the Derwent River. Newcastle is 120 miles north of Sydney. Port Macquarie is perhaps 250 miles north of Sydney. Pretty desperate places in those days. There was a problem in the Colony. What to do with recidivists ? Chain gangs needed too many guards. The answer was the establishment of penal settlements whose remoteness would deter escape, whose severity and frightening unfamiliarity would instil salutary terror. The first penal outstation was Newcastle ! By 1817, the convict population amounted to more than 500 prisoners. Newcastle in New South Wales was and is a coal mining town. Although the coal mining work was indeed terrible, worse working conditions existed. Lime was required for mortar to support the Sydney building program. The lime had to be burnt to make the mortar. The vast beds of oysters close to Newcastle provided a mineral lime for mortar not available in Sydney. The conditions were dreadful. The main preoccupation amongst prisoners was to escape. By 1820, the usefulness of Newcastle as a place of secondary punishment was waning because of the growing importance of the hinterland in the Upper Hunter Valley as well as the difficulty of containing prisoners in a remote but active commercial environment. Newcastle was thrown open to free trade and settlement in 1823 - the year Thomas was transported and sent to Port Macquarie. Its convicts stayed on; by 1827 there were 1600 convicts in Newcastle, but it was no longer just a jail for the twice convicted. Wait for it. That role was assumed by a new settlement started in 1821, 270 miles north of Sydney : - Port Macquarie. This was where they sent incorrigible, life sentence prisoners convicted of second offences. Discipline was severe. Possession of writing paper got the prisoner one month in the cells; trying to smuggle out a letter was worth 100 lashes. Escapes were common, but the local Aboriginal trackers were keen to catch the bolters. Black Australian bounty hunters. An examination of the last 1823 entry reveals that our Thomas might have been a naughty boy again. He was convicted at the Sydney Bench on 18 October 1823, of what I do not know, yet. The sentence column reads either " Review sentence " or " Renew sentence " . I cannot decipher the words, but the other evidence would indicate to me that he had been found guilty of something. The shipping records reveal that he was one of " 44 male prisoners transported to Port Macquarie on board Her Majesty's Colonial Brig Lady Nelson ". The records show their respective sentences and the place, time of trial and original sentences extracted from indents of ships by which they arrived - 31 October 1823 . There were two other passengers, both female who were not convicts; they were travelling with their prisoner husbands. Neither is named Snelson. So, presumably Thomas was not married then. By 1830 Port Macquarie had become the home of the Specials - that is, the convict intelligentsia, educated troublemakers, amputees ( I can't resist this - I assume the amputee is the guy with the missing limb, not the surgeon ! ), the blind, crippled, the insane, one-armed stone breakers and drunks. To get this all into some perspective, Port Macquarie became the home for first grave offences; Moreton Bay ( Brisbane ) became the home for runaways from Port Macquarie; Norfolk Island - there was nothing worse; no island prison ever bestowed such hardship and viciousness on its inmates; no point of exile was ever established further from reason, openness or equity; no prison was so remote; Norfolk Island was 500 miles eastward out to sea from the remotest and most distant arm of the Empire; a trip to Norfolk Island was a single ticket. What does all this mean for our Thomas ? I think it means that there was a second sentence doesn't it ? What did Thomas do to be shipped yet again - this time to a hell-hole worse than the one he was already in. What sort of human being was our Thomas ? What happened to Thomas after 1823 ? I'm working on it, but the fact that he fades into oblivion after 1837 is a mystery - especially as he won his ticket of leave in 1830. Stand by. His ticket of leave was number 30/714 which was granted on 8 November 1830 some 18 years after conviction. The Ticket describes Thomas as having a ruddy complexion, sandy hair and hazel to grey eyes. It's amazing what a few years in the tropics can do to a man ! He must have cleaned up his act to get a ticket of leave. TOLs were usually granted after four years good conduct on a seven year sentence. Presumably the convicts who had been sentenced for serious offences may have had to wait longer. They allowed convicts to work for persons other than an assigned master. They also allowed convicts to be free from forced government labour, but the Ticket of Leave convict was not permitted to leave the Colony of New South Wales; it was not a pardon, nor was it the equivalent to the modern day notion of parole. Thomas, with a TOL was still a convict, still a prisoner, still constrained by the system. The Ticket of Leave had to be renewed each year and could be revoked at any time. Many assigned convicts were unfairly treated by masters who maliciously preferred charges against them on the grounds of insolence, threatening language or some other such trumped up charge or fabricated allegations - the effect of which was to earn the prisoners 50 lashes and another year's sentence - and continuing servitude to the master. However, a Ticket of Leave once granted, allowed a convict to work for his own benefit and to acquire property on the condition that he resided within a prescribed area, attended a muster every few months and attended church weekly. More of this story has now been unravelled. A Conditional Pardon was granted on the condition that the grantee resided in the territory, state or colony as a freeman; that is, he had all the rights of a free man, with the exception that he was not allowed to leave New South Wales. Many did a bunk of course, and tried to get back to the owld dart to see their loved ones and family, friends and rellies. I wonder whether Thomas did this ..... maybe he wouldn't want to see them again - nor they he ! Many disappeared without trace of course; being found outside the Sovereign State ( as it was then, before joining with the other sovereign states to form the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901 ) was punishable by death. Quite a terminal judgement really, don't you think ? When the application for a pardon had been approved by the Secretary of State and certified by the Governor of New South Wales, the certificate was registered and the instrument sent to the clerk of the Supreme Court with a copy to the principle Superintendent of Convicts for passing to the convict .... at least, that's how I think the system worked. The sequence is interesting, as the Governor certified the Pardon before having it approved by the Secretary of State. I am still chasing the Pardon to try and get the grounds on which it was granted. I spent an hour or so at the Archives Office yesterday, but could only find the references to the granting of the pardon, and the fact that it is indeed our man, as the Vessel "Earl Spencer" is given. In case you hadn't gathered this before, in every reference to a convict, the same elements of data are given as identification, as follows :- Name ( Thomas Snelson ) Date of Arrival in Colony ( 1813 ) Ship ( "Earl Spencer" ). A late entry - I have found the following entry in the miscellaneous correspondence of the Secretary of State and the Principal Registrar of Convicts :- " Pardon No. 39/426, Dated Nov 1 1838 ( repeat 1838 ), Name Thomas Snelson, Ship " Earl Spencer ", Master Mitchell, Year of Arrival 1813, Native Place Wolverhampton, Trade Smith, Sentence Life, Year of Birth 1788, Height 5' 5", Complexion Ruddy, Hair Sandy, Eyes Grey." Submitted for the signature of Sir George Gipps Secretary of State Duplicates returned signed 31 December 1838 Approved by Despatch No. 101 26 July 1839 for collection by Individual on Payment of the Stated five shillings and sixpence. " Who said freedom didn't have its price ? The price is 5s 6d. What a sad story. I wonder what influences from his homelife brought Thomas from Staffordshire unwillingly to this hostile land; where would we all be if it wasn't for the labours of the convicts and pioneers ? This is still frontier country; what is it that drives us willingly in the late 1900's to the ends of the world ? Oh Thomas, if you could see this country now, what would you think of it ? In February 1993, Charles and I went together to the NSW Archives Office to see whether in a few hours we could find anything else. We found (1) Convict Marriage Banns 1826-1841 Nil (2) Register of Convicts Applications to Marry Oct 1842 to Feb 1851 Nil (3) Port Macquarie List of Convicts at the Settlement 1822-1830 :- "53.3 Snelson Thomas 16,12" . (4) List of Convicts Transported to Port Macquarie on board his majesty's colonial brig Lady Nelson with their respected sentences annexed thereto and also their original places, times of trial and sentences extracted from the indents of the ships by which they arrived in the colony. Sydney New South Wales 31 October 1823 :- "Thomas Snelson Bench Sydney 18 October 1823 Renew Sentence Locksmith Earl Spencer Stafford 12 November 1812 Life." In December 1993, I found in the New South Wales Gazette the announcement of the Conditional Pardon. In a letter from the Colonial Secretary's Office dated 16th December 1839, is a reference to Despatch number 101 dated 25th July 1839 from the Secretary of State for the Colonies, in which Her Majesty's Conditional Pardon dated 1st November 1838 is granted to some 80 or so people, including "Snelson Thomas, Earl Spencer". [:CR:]. |
| Reference Number | He had reference number 2236. |
| Birth | He was born in October 1787 in Staffordshire In the record for 12 March 1812, Thomas is given as being aged 26 years making his birth date between 12 March 1786 and 11 March 1787. From the convict records, we can see that Thomas records his year of birth as 1788 on at least two occasions ( 8 November 1830 and 26 July 1839 ).2 |
| Courtcase | He; 21 October 1811; Thomas Snelson's unlawful return from transportation The allegation was that he had " feloniously returned from transportation before expiration thereof without lawful excuse. Condemned ". It is possible of course that he never got further than the hulks on the first occasion. Some prisoners spent all of their sentences on the hulks .... this would still be referred to as "transportation" perhaps. The hulk records are listed in the Guide to the AONSW, p267. [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Defendant]] |
| Crime | He; 3 November 1811; Stafford; buglariously entered the house of Thomas Deakin ( Dakin ) When taken, Ben had bags containing 720 pieces of copper coin valued at 3 pounds and another with 1440 pieces value 3 pounds along with two promissory notes total value 2 pounds. The citation reads " ... and with force did did steal and carry away, did feloniously and burglariously did break out to get out ...[:ITAL] " [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: criminal]]3 |
| Residence | He resided in Wolverhampton, Staffordshire, about 1812.4 |
| Courtcase | He; 12 March 1812; Stafford Assizes; the theft of copper coins worth five pounds Benjamin Walters was sentenced to 14 years - his native place being given as "Derbyshire" - and his occupation as labourer, aged 20 years. He was eventually given a conditional pardon # 1491. The contact here is Karen Hughes on Soft-Tech BBS. [:CR:] [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Defendant]]5 |
| Courtcase | He; 12 November 1812; Stafford, Staffordshire; " his return from transportation before expiration of his time " He was sentenced to death but this was commuted to transportation for life. [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Defendant]]6 |
| Occupation | He was an as a locksmith in Wolverhampton, Staffordshire, before 1813. |
| Transporta | He; 2 June 1813; from England on the convict transport ship, on the ship the "Earl Spencer", to Australia; [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Convict]] |
| Transporta | He; 9 October 1813; and arrived the penal colony of New South Wales on; [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Convict]] |
| Transporta | He; 4 April 1814; least he is listed to be sent, on the ship "Wyndham" to the Derwent, in Tasmania; [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Convict]] |
| Transporta | He; 22 October 1815; least he is listed to be sent, on the ship "Estramina" to Newcastle; [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Convict]] |
| Residence | He resided in Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia, about 1823. |
| Courtcase | He; 18 October 1823; a decision that he serve out his original life sentence [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Defendant]] |
| Transporta | He; 31 October 1823; on the ship "Lady Nelson", to Port Macquarie; [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Convict]] |
| Residence | He resided in Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia, about 1827.7 |
| Residence | He resided in was living, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia, about 1827. |
| Ticketofle | He; 8 November 1830; was granted a Ticket of Leave by the Bathurst Bench, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia; The Ticket of Leave # 30/714 states that Thomas is allowed to remain in the District of Bathurst. [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Convict]]8 |
| Publicatio | He; 1 November 1838; in a Register of recommendations for Conditional Pardons [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Person Mentioned]]9 |
| Pardon | He; 26 July 1839; Pardon # 39/426 was granted by the Governor Sir George Gipps knight, conditionally remitting the remainder of the sentence passed at Stafford on 12 March 1812, " provided always and on condition that the said Thomas Snelson continue to reside within the limits of this Government for and during the space thy original order of transportation otherwise Thomas Snelson shall be subject to all the paind and penalties of reappearing in Great Britain and Ireland for and during the term of thy original sentence as if this remission had never been granted ". Signed George Gipps 1 November 1838. [[Principal Role]] [[Witness Role: Pardoned]]10 |
| Death | He died after 1840. |
Census
| Label and Year | Manual |
|---|---|
| Census 1814 | Thomas Snelson Id #6,646 (Principal) was at home on Census night 1814 at the Muster as a convict "off stores" assigned to a Mr. Lord, Sydney; 1814 General Muster of NSW, published by the ABGR, entry 5163 S(ydney), Thomas (S)Nelson Earl Spencer C(onvict) Off (stores) to Mr. Lord ... he was Simon Lord, magistrate. Principal Role Witness Role: Convict Original Documents, Source and Citations here11 |
| Census 1825 | Thomas Snelson Id #6,646 (Principal) was at home on Census night 1825 at the Convict Muster PRO Reel 66A, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia; The Muster Record seems to state that he is serving 7 years of an extended sentence at Port Macquarie .... but maybe my eyes deceive me ? Principal Role Witness Role: Convict Original Documents, Source and Citations here |
| Census 1837 | Thomas Snelson Id #6,646 (Principal) was at home on Census night 1837 at the 1837 Convict Muster, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia; Principal Role Witness Role: Convict Original Documents, Source and Citations here12 |
Citations
- [S366] Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Gazette
- [S631] Charles Elson Jeoffrey SNELSON, Why Convict Thomas Snelson is Thomas William Snelson 1782-??
- [S730] Karen Hughes, Ben Walters
- [S171] Stafford Assizes 1809 & 1812 - Recorded by Wendy, R3-5010
- [S802] Convict Indent - Thomas Snelson, Ship "Earl Spencer" - 1813
- [S806] Criminal Register - Thomas Snelson, PRO Reel 2755
- [S363] Convict Records - NSW State Archives Office
- [S803] Ticket of Leave - Thomas Snelson, Bathurst - 1830
- [S804] Register of Recommendations - Thomas Snelson, Condtional Pardons - 1838
- [S805] Conditional Pardon - Thomas Snelson, Sydney - 1838-40
- [S800] General Muster of NSW - Thomas Nelson, Sydney - 1814
- [S801] Convict Muster - Thomas Snelson, Bathurst - 1837
Margaret Unknown1,2
F, #6649, Deceased, b. about 1053, d. after 1084
Interactive Pedigree Button
Parents
| Father | Richard Goz Unknown (d. 1066) |
| Mother | Emma de Conteville |
Family: Ranulf de Meschines (b. about 1050, d. 1129)
| Son | Ranulph le Meschines Unknown+ (b. 1074, d. 1129) |
Main Events
| Also Known As | Margaret Unknown was also known as Margaret de Meschines. |
| User Reference Number | She; 18680 |
| Birth | She was born about 1053.1 |
| Her father Richard Goz Unknown died in 1066. | |
| Marriage | Margaret Unknown and Ranulf de Meschines were married about 1069 in Normandy, France.2,1 |
| Her son Ranulph le Meschines Unknown was born in 1074 in France. | |
| Death | She died after 1084.1 |
| Her husband Ranulf de Meschines died in 1129. |
Citations
Gilkerson Carr Brough
M, #6650, Deceased, b. 22 January 1903, d. September 1977
| Consanguinity | Partner of Gladys Evelyn Alletson (1st cousin 1 time removed of Adrian John Snelson) |
Parents
| Father | George Gilkerson Brough |
| Mother | Elizabeth Brown McDowell |
Family: Gladys Evelyn Alletson (b. 1899, d. 23 April 1989)
Main Events
| Occupation | Gilkerson Carr Brough was a Railway Controller. |
| User Reference Number | He; 23811 |
| Birth | He was born on 22 January 1903 in Carlisle, England. |
| Marriage | Gilkerson Carr Brough and Gladys Evelyn Alletson were married on 16 June 1928 in St Margaret, Frizinghall, Yorkshire. |
| Death | He died in September 1977, at age 74, in Northamptonshire, England. |
| His wife Gladys Evelyn Alletson died on 23 April 1989 in Derby, England. |